link to classbrain.com home page link to classbrain.com home page link to teens home page link to teens home page link to teens school matters link to teens subjects link to teens after hours link to classbrain.com home page

Subjects Home 
 
  Art & Music
 
  ClassBrain DMOZ Directory
 
  Drivers Education
 
  Foreign Language
 
  Language Arts
 
  Law
 
  Math
 
  Physical Education
 
  Practical Arts
 
  Science
 
  Social Studies
  Current Events
  Geography
  History
  Political Cartoons
  Sociology
 plug-in page link  link to ask classbrain
Political Cartoons  


The Political Candidates and Their Stands on the Environment
By Cartoon: Paresh Nath, National Herald, India
Project: Cynthia Kirkeby, ClassBrain
Jan 7, 2008, 09:51 PST



© Paresh Nath, National Herald, India 2007


Where do the leading presidential candidates stand on the issue of climate change and other environmental issues?

In the following recap from EarthTalk, you can see where the leading candidates stand on some of the top environmental issues:

The outcome of the 2008 presidential election could very well have a big impact on a wide range of environmental issues, especially climate change.

All of the Democratic candidates—Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Bill Richardson and Dennis Kucinich—support reducing carbon dioxide emissions nationally upwards of 80 percent by 2050 in order to stave off global warming. Likewise, each would like to see fuel efficiency standards for cars and light trucks raised to at least 40 miles per gallon within the next few decades. Meanwhile, only one of the major Republican contenders, John McCain, has even articulated a position on the issue of global warming, with most favoring expanding our base of greenhouse gas-spewing coal-fired power plants.

As for specific track records, Clinton has an impressive record of introducing pro-environment legislation into Congress, and for her time in the Senate scores a 90 (out of 100) on green voting from the nonprofit, non-partisan League of Conservation Voters (LCV). Obama is newer to the politics of the environment, but scored a 96 for his two years in the Senate from LCV, and has garnered kudos from environmental leaders for the aggressive climate and energy plan he unveiled in October 2007.

Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich wants to launch a Works Green Administration similar to the Works Progress Administration of the Great Depression, only this time to benefit the environment through the development of alternative energy technologies and infrastructures. Bill Richardson, who served as Secretary of Energy under Bill Clinton and more recently as governor of New Mexico, wants to be the “energy president,” and has an 82 lifetime rating from LCV to back it up. He has proposed the most ambitious carbon reduction plan of any of the candidates (90 percent by 2050). John Edwards was the first candidate to make his campaign carbon neutral in March 2007, and greens consider him perhaps the most progressive of all the Democrats on the climate issue.

On the Republican side, the environmental bright spots are few and far between. McCain is really the only choice with any declared concern for the environment. In 2003 he co-sponsored the first Senate bill aimed at mandatory economy-wide reductions. While the bill didn’t garner enough votes to pass, it set the stage for future iterations that could put the U.S. on par with European nations as leaders in the fight to cut carbon emissions. McCain is also the only Republican candidate specifically opposed to drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Mike Huckabee scores some points with greens for his willingness to consider a specific increase in automotive fuel efficiency standards and for his (limited) embrace of alternative energy. Mitt Romney is willing to consider a cap on emissions, but only if enacted on a global basis (including China and India, that is). The remaining Republicans (Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson and Ron Paul) have best been non-committal on climate change and environmental issues in general.



Questions to Ponder

  • Is there much difference between the stance of the Democratic candidates and the Republican candidates?

  • Are the carbon offsets that businesses are currently beginning to trade going to actually do anything for the environment, or are they strictly something that looks good on paper?

  • Are any of the candidates willing to take a strong stance on global warming?

  • Do you think the Works Green Administration proposed by Ohio Congressman Kucinich would be a good idea?

  • How does the Works Green Administration compare to the Works Progress Administration of the Great Depression?




Learning Links for the Environmental Issues and Emissions Trading







© Copyright 2008 by Classbrain.com

Top of Page



Google

Search ClassBrain
Search WWW

DICTIONARY


Political Cartoons
Latest Headlines
The Big One
Aid to Myanmar
Gas-Pedal
Freud's Anniversary
What is a Caucus
Super Delegates - The Ultimate Voting Power
Subprime Mortgage Meltdown
The Political Candidates and Their Stands on the Environment
Historic Fruitcake
Fire in Vice President Cheney's Offices
Gillian Gibbons and The Infidel Bear, Mohammed
State Education Boards and Evolution
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
Omnibus Budget Bill Overflowing With Special Interest Earmarks
California Wildfires
State of Emergency
Measly Corporate Severance Packages
Bee Colony Collapse Disorder
Tour de Farce: Doping Scandals in the Tour de France
Presidential Approval Rating at 28%

Corporate info | ClassBrain Home | Privacy and Copyright | Contact | Parents & Teachers | NeedHelp?